Journal: The EMBO Journal
Article Title: STIM1-containing contact sites promote direct calcium flux from the endoplasmic reticulum to mitochondria
doi: 10.1038/s44318-026-00700-8
Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) STIM1-KO HEK293 cells inducibly expressing STIM1-GFP, or GFP only (empty GFP-vector) as a control, were washed twice in Ca 2+ -free HBSS and incubated with 1 μM Tg in Ca 2+ -free HBSS for 2 min. Cells from the SOCE-free condition (-Ca 2+ ) were then lysed. Cells from the SOCE-allowed condition (+Ca 2+ ) were incubated for an additional 2 min with 1 μM Tg + 2 mM CaCl before lysis. Immunoprecipitation of GFP-tagged proteins was performed using 1 mg WCL, and the co-precipitation of GRP75 was evaluated by immunoblotting. A fraction of WCL from the untreated condition (3 μg) was loaded as a positive control. Levels of immunoprecipitated GFP were assessed as a loading control. Levels of total GRP75 and total STIM1-GFP were evaluated from WCL by immunoblotting (30 μg protein/lane) and are shown in Fig. . ( B ) Quantification of co-precipitated GRP75 (from 4 independent experiments for resting and Tg-treated samples, 2 experiments for SOCE-allowed samples). Statistical analysis with unpaired t-test. Control vs Tg, p = 0.0021; Control vs Tg+Ca 2+ , p = 0.0038. Data are plotted as mean ± S.D. ( C ) Evaluation of ER-mitochondria contacts after Tg treatment by PLA. Wild-type HEK293 cells were washed twice with Ca 2+ -free HBSS and incubated with 1 μM Tg in this medium for 2 min, as in ( A ). Cells were then fixed and incubated with mouse anti-VAPB and rabbit anti-PTPIP51 antibodies, as well as with the DNA probes rabbit-PLUS and mouse-MINUS. The untreated control was fixed with methanol directly from the culture medium, without any washing step. The interaction of proteins (red dots) was analyzed under fluorescence microscopy. Representative images are shown in the figure. Scale bar = 10 μm. Negative controls are shown in Fig. . ( D ) Quantification of the interactions detected by PLA, with the number of cells evaluated in parentheses. The mean of the data is represented by the black line. Statistical analysis with unpaired t-test, **** p < 0.0001. ( E ) Analysis of the STIM1-GRP75 interaction during ER Ca 2+ release triggered by ATP+CCh. Cells were washed twice with HBSS, then twice with Ca 2+ -free HBSS, and incubated with 100 μM ATP + 100 μM CCh in Ca 2+ -free HBSS for 15–30 s before lysis. Immunoprecipitation of GFP-tagged proteins was performed using 1 mg WCL, and co-precipitated GRP75 was analyzed by immunoblotting. For the untreated control (0-s condition), lysis was conducted immediately after the first two washes with HBSS. Levels of immunoprecipitated GFP were analyzed as a loading control. Total levels of GRP75 in WCL were assessed by immunoblotting (30 μg protein/lane) and are shown in Fig. . ( F ) Quantification of co-precipitated GRP75 from 2 independent experiments and 4 technical replicates. Statistical analysis with unpaired t-test, **** p < 0.0001 and p = 0.2266 (n.s.). Data are plotted as mean ± S.D. ( G ) Quantification of ER-mitochondria contacts in U2OS cells expressing Mito-GA and ER-B, as described in Fig. . Reconstitution of green fluorescence was normalized to the total mitochondrial mass, revealed with anti-TOM20 + AlexaFluor 594 (red) immunofluorescence. Data show the mean (black line) from two independent experiments. Statistical analysis with unpaired t-test, p = 0.0014. ( H ) HEK293 cells were washed twice with HBSS, then twice with Ca 2+ -free HBSS, and incubated with 100 μM ATP + 100 μM CCh in Ca 2+ -free HBSS for 30 s before isolation of MER, TH, CM, MAM, and ER. For the untreated control (0-s condition), lysis was conducted immediately after the first two washes with HBSS. STIM1 and GRP75 levels were analyzed by immunoblotting. ACSL4 and ERLIN2 were assessed as positive controls for MAMs, while VDAC1 and TOM20 were assessed as positive controls for MER and CM. In all cases, 7 μg protein was loaded in each lane. ( I ) Top panels: Quantification of GRP75 and STIM1 in MAMs was performed using data from 4 independent subcellular fractionation experiments. For normalization, GRP75 levels in MAMs were normalized to levels in TH, and STIM1 levels in MAMs were normalized to levels in ER. Bottom panels: Quantification of STIM1 and GRP75 levels in TH. Data are normalized to resting conditions. Statistical analysis with unpaired t-test. p < 0.0001 for GRP75 in MAM, p = 0.0003 for STIM1 in MAM, p = 0.0757 for total GRP75, and p = 0.1220 for total STIM1. Data are plotted as mean ± S.E.M. ( J ) Co-immunoprecipitation assays were performed using 1 mg WCL from STIM1-KO HEK293 cells inducibly expressing STIM1-GFP, STIM1(R429C)-GFP, or GFP only (empty GFP vector) as a control. The co-precipitation of GRP75 was evaluated by immunoblotting. A fraction of WCL (3 μg) from cells expressing STIM1-GFP was loaded as a positive control. Blots are representative of 3 biological replicates. Levels of immunoprecipitated GFP were assessed as a loading control. Total levels of GRP75 from WCL were analyzed by immunoblotting (30 μg protein/lane) and are shown in Fig. . ( K ) Quantification of the co-precipitation data ( n = 6 technical replicates from 3 biological replicates) is shown. Data were normalized to immunoprecipitated GFP levels and plotted as mean ± S.D. Statistical analysis with unpaired t-test, p < 0.0001. ( L ) STIM1-KO HEK293 cells inducibly expressing STIM1-GFP or STIM1(R429C)-GFP, labeled as WT or R429C in the graph, were fixed and incubated with mouse anti-VAPB and rabbit anti-PTPIP51 antibodies and the DNA probes rabbit-PLUS and mouse-MINUS. Scale bar = 10 μm. Negative controls are shown in Fig. . ( M ) Quantification of the number of interactions per cell. The number of cells analyzed is indicated in parentheses, and the mean of data is represented by the black line. Statistical analysis with unpaired t-test, p < 0.0001. .
Article Snippet: Clarified lysates were incubated with 5 μl anti-STIM1 antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, #5668) in binding buffer (10 mM NaH 2 PO 4 pH 7.0, 140 mM NaCl, 0.05% Triton X-100) overnight at 4 °C with gentle rotation.
Techniques: Expressing, Plasmid Preparation, Control, Incubation, Lysis, Immunoprecipitation, Western Blot, Positive Control, Fluorescence, Microscopy, Immunofluorescence, Isolation, Fractionation, Labeling